Duchess of Sussex Demands £1.5 Mln In Costs From Newspaper Which Published Letter To Her Father

Last month Meghan Markle received a victory in opposition to the Mail on Sunday and Associated Newspapers  when the High Court in London dominated the newspaper invaded her privateness by printing a leaked letter to her father. But they’re nonetheless arguing over who owned the copyright of the letter.

The Duchess of Sussex – the American actress Meghan Markle – is demanding Associated Newspapers pay her “substantial compensation” and likewise authorized prices, which might attain £1.5 million, after a choose dominated in her favour final month.

She is suing for “misuse of private information” in relation to a number of articles revealed within the Mail on Sunday and the Mail Online in February 2019. 

The articles have since been eliminated and Associated Newspapers have provided to pay £1 in nominal damages.

On Tuesday, 2 March, Lord Justice Warby urged an interim injunction to stop her letter to her father being revealed once more, after she claimed her copyright had been infringed. 

​​The duchess – higher often called Meghan Markle – sued Associated Newspapers after it revealed giant parts of a five-page letter to her estranged father Thomas Markle.

Last month Lord Justice Warby dominated the Mail had misused the Duchess of Sussex’s non-public info in a abstract judgement that headed off a trial set for the autumn.

On Tuesday, 2 March, Judge Warby urged an interim injunction to guard the letter from being revealed forward of a “mini-trial” later within the yr on the difficulty of who owned the copyright.

​The 38-year-old duchess claims she had sole possession of the copyright of the letter however Associated Newspapers claimed it was co-authored by Jason Knauf, who was on the time the Kensington Palace communications secretary.

The duchess’s attorneys mentioned it was “fanciful” to recommend Mr Knauf owned a share of the copyright of the letter.

She is looking for damages for misuse of non-public info, copyright infringement and knowledge safety breaches.

Her lawyer, Justin Rushbrooke QC, mentioned she was looking for “substantial compensation” for breach of privateness.

Adrian Speck QC, representing Associated Newspapers, mentioned it was additionally attainable that the letter can be coated by Crown copyright. 

The couple moved to California final yr and have develop into estranged from the remaining of the Royal Family.


Sourse: sputniknews.com

About The Author

Related posts