Second Clinton Donor on Biden’s DOJ Hook: Will It Lead to Prosecution of Democratic & GOP Crooks?

Joe Biden’s DOJ introduced to the bay two former Clinton Foundation donors over their illicit funding of GOP campaigns. So, does it imply the Justice Department is on a fishing expedition towards Donald Trump and the Republicans? If so, this might backfire on the Dems, says Wall Street analyst Charles Ortel.

On 31 March, the US Department of Justice introduced that Lebanese-Nigerian billionaire Gilbert Chagoury, 75, had been fined $1.8 million for conspiring along with his associates to violate federal election legal guidelines by “scheming to make illegal campaign contributions to US presidential and congressional candidates.”

Disparate Treatment in Two Fraud Cases

Chagoury, who presently resides in Paris, routed roughly $180,000 by way of straw donors to 4 completely different federal political candidates in US elections. Although the DOJ press launch doesn’t title the politicians, Politico advised that the donations in query match with $100,000 in presents to a Mitt Romney presidential marketing campaign fund in 2012; $10,000 to the 2014 marketing campaign of former GOP Representative Lee Terry of Nebraska; $30,000 to the 2014 marketing campaign of Republican Representative Darrell Issa of California; and $30,200 to the 2016 marketing campaign of Nebraskan Republican congressman Jeff Fortenberry.

The Lebanese-Nigerian billionaire’s case is strikingly related to that of Imaad Zuberi, a Pakistani-American enterprise capitalist dubbed a “Trump donor” by the media, who was lately sentenced to 12 years in jail and a multi-million greenback superb. Both businessmen funded politicians on each side of the aisle; each illegally funnelled overseas cash into US federal elections; each have been prosecuted by the identical workplace; and each seem to have supplied precious data to the US authorities.

However, unike Zuberi, Chagoury was slapped with a superb, no jail time period, and deferred prosecution. One of Zuberi’s legal professionals, quoted by investigative journalist John Solomon, advised that “such disparate sentences demonstrate the gross injustice of Zuberi’s sentence.”

But that isn’t all: one of Chagoury’s “recipients,” Obama-era Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, who obtained a comparatively delicate sentence for getting $50,000 in illicit “loan” from the Nigerian-Lebanese businessmen in 2012 by repaying it and being fined simply $40,000.

The evident disparity in punishments have sparked suspicion about potential corruption and pay-to-play video games within the higher echelons of authorities, suggests Wall Street analyst Charles Ortel.

Photo : YouTube/Holy Spirit University of Kaslik – USEKGilbert Chagoury

Influence-for-Money Trade?

While being accused of unlawful donations to Republican politicians Chagoury is best recognized for his decades-long “friendship” with the Clinton household, says Ortel: “Peter Schweizer was first to bring my focus on Chagoury in his excellent book Clinton Cash.”

Gilbert Chagoury appeared on the Clintons’ horizon within the mid-Nineteen Nineties. In August 1996 then President Bill Clinton despatched his emissary, Bill Richardson, to maintain talks with Nigerian dictator Sani Abacha. Chagoury had shut ties with Abacha and lent a sympathetic ear to Richardson in a non-public dialogue after the latter’s assembly with the dictator.

In July 1997, Chagoury held a gathering on US-Nigeria strained relations with excessive degree administration officers on the White House. Still, after Abacha’s loss of life in 1998, the businessman was convicted of cash laundering in Switzerland in 2000 in reference to the dictator’s household: Abacha had stolen a minimum of $5 billion of public cash between 1993 and 1998, in accordance to worldwide watchdog. Chagoury returned an estimated $300 million held in Swiss financial institution accounts to the Nigerian authorities in change for immunity from any potential prices.

The billionaire, who continued collaborating with the Clintons, helped organise a Caribbean journey throughout which Bill Clinton was paid $100,000 for a speech in 2003. Furthermore, Chagoury donated from $1 million to $5 million to the Clinton Foundation, which Ortel suspects to be “one of the largest unprosecuted frauds ever.” For comparability’s sake, Zuberi, who can be listed among the many charity’s donors, supplied considerably between $250,000 and $500,000 to the muse.

During Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential marketing campaign, Chagoury’s Los Angeles relative Michel Chaghouri raised $100,000 for the ex-first woman, receiving cash “from a number of individuals named “Chagoury’ or ‘Chaghouri’ or ‘Chamchoum’,” the Wall Street Journal reported on 20 December 2008, including that Chamchoum is a maiden title of Gilbert Chagoury’s spouse.

The Nigerian-Lebanese billionaire apparently tried to curry favour with US high officers underneath Hillary Clinton’s tenure as a secretary of state. According to emails, launched at Judicial Watch’s FOIA request, Bill Clinton’s longtime aide Doug Band wrote to Hillary’s aides searching for hyperlinks with the State Department’s high official on Lebanon on behalf of the billionaire in April 2009. However, the assembly allegedly by no means happened.

AP Photo / Paul SancyaFormer President Bill Clinton and spouse Hillary Clinton, left, speaking through the funeral service for Aretha Franklin at Greater Grace Temple, Friday, Aug. 31, 2018, in Detroit
Danger of Selective Justice

The DOJ’s 31 March press launch means that Chagoury supplied precious assist to the US authorities, however doesn’t elaborate. One might assume that the Nigerian-Lebanese businessman possesses doubtlessly damning data regarding Democratic and Republican politicians and their “pay-to-play” scheming. It solely relies upon on how the Justice Department will use it, in accordance to Ortel.

If the DOJ is actually severe about going after crooks and their overseas enablers, it ought to goal politicians on each side of the aisle, the analyst argues. He advised that affect will at all times be “for sale” not directly in methods which can be troublesome to hint, significantly involving overseas events. For instance, funds could be characterised as talking charges, e-book offers, consulting contracts or disguised in off market funding scams. “In addition, graft can be routed to family members, friends, or others in ways that are tough for veteran investigators to spot,” the Wall Street analyst elaborates, warning towards selective, politically biased justice.

Ortel hopes that “Chagoury has come clean and tipped the DOJ and FBI to other criminal activities that are being prosecuted and that high level targets will actually pay at long last for their bad examples.”

“One way or another, we soon may see whether crime pays well or costs dearly here in America,” he concludes.

The views and opinions expressed within the article don’t essentially replicate these of Sputnik.


About The Author

Related posts